Multi-Pass Review — Preventing Attention Dilution
Core 6 min +25 XP
💡
THE ANALOGY
Medical specialists vs one generalist reviewing 20 lab results. The cardiologist reviews cardiac results with full attention. The neurologist reviews neurological results with full attention. A generalist reviewing all 20 simultaneously misses the interaction between result 7 and result 15.
⚠️ EXAM TRAP — The Wrong Answer People Choose
Sending all changed files to one Claude call. With 15 files in one context, each file gets roughly 1/15th of effective attention — issues that per-file review catches get missed in the noise.
KEY POINTS
1 Attention dilution: reviewing many files at once reduces effective attention per file.
2 Multi-pass: per-file reviews (parallel, full attention per file) → cross-file synthesis (sequential).
3 Cross-file pass receives structured per-file summaries — NOT raw file contents.
4 Contradictions between per-file findings surfaced and routed to human resolution.
5 Two passes minimum — per-file correctness + cross-file integration.